Screener
FBCV vs FELG
Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF vs Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- FELG costs 0.39% less per year.
- FELG is significantly larger than FBCV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FELG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FBCV | FELG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.57% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $160M | $5.3B |
| Since | 2020 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.44% | 0.36% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.5% | +28.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.92 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.61% | 15.56% |
| Max drawdown | -15.55% | -23.89% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FBCV and FELG
Explore further