Screener
FBCV vs FIVA
Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF vs Fidelity International Value Factor ETF
Key differences
- FIVA costs 0.39% less per year.
- FIVA is significantly larger than FBCV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FBCV follows a active selection strategy; FIVA uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, FIVA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FBCV | FIVA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.57% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $160M | $533M |
| Since | 2020 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 1.44% | 2.63% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.5% | +35.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.0% | +21.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.7% | +12.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.92 | 1.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.61% | 15.23% |
| Max drawdown | -15.55% | -39.60% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FBCV and FIVA
Explore further