Screener
FBCV vs FVAL
Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF vs Fidelity Value Factor ETF
Key differences
- FVAL costs 0.42% less per year.
- FVAL is significantly larger than FBCV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FBCV follows a active selection strategy; FVAL uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, FVAL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FBCV | FVAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.57% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $160M | $1.2B |
| Since | 2020 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 1.44% | 1.56% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.5% | +31.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.0% | +21.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.7% | +12.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.92 | 1.18 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.61% | 11.74% |
| Max drawdown | -15.55% | -37.26% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FBCV and FVAL
Explore further