Screener
FBCV vs KONG
Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF vs Formidable Fortress ETF
Key differences
- FBCV costs 0.32% less per year.
- FBCV is significantly larger than KONG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FBCV is classified as equity, while KONG is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- FBCV follows a active selection strategy; KONG uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, FBCV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FBCV | KONG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.57% | 0.89% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $160M | $22M |
| Since | 2020 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.44% | 0.36% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.4% | +7.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.1% | +9.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.93 | 0.48 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.58% | 10.90% |
| Max drawdown | -15.55% | -19.98% |
Similar to FBCV and KONG
Explore further