Screener
FBCV vs TCHP
Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF vs T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF
Key differences
- TCHP is significantly larger than FBCV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FBCV follows a active selection strategy; TCHP uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, TCHP has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FBCV | TCHP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.57% | 0.57% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $160M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2020 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 1.44% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.5% | +23.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.0% | +26.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.7% | +12.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.92 | 1.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.61% | 16.22% |
| Max drawdown | -15.55% | -42.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FBCV and TCHP
Explore further