Screener
TCHP vs FBCG
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF vs Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
Key differences
- TCHP covers north america markets; FBCG covers global.
- TCHP follows a index tracking strategy; FBCG uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, FBCG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| TCHP | FBCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.57% | 0.57% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.1B | $6.2B |
| Since | 2020 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.04% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.6% | +39.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.7% | +32.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.3% | +16.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.11 | 1.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.22% | 18.65% |
| Max drawdown | -42.34% | -43.56% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TCHP and FBCG
Explore further