Screener
FBCV vs TGRT
Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF vs T. Rowe Price Growth ETF
Key differences
- TGRT costs 0.19% less per year.
- TGRT is significantly larger than FBCV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FBCV follows a active selection strategy; TGRT uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| FBCV | TGRT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.57% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $160M | $1.2B |
| Since | 2020 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.44% | 0.08% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.5% | +24.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.92 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.61% | 16.15% |
| Max drawdown | -15.55% | -22.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FBCV and TGRT
Explore further