Screener
FBL vs CONL
GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF vs GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF
Key differences
- CONL costs 0.05% less per year.
- CONL is significantly larger than FBL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FBL is classified as equity, while CONL is cryptocurrency — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, FBL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FBL | CONL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.09% | 1.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $185M | $582M |
| Since | 2022 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 2.63% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | cryptocurrency |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | leveraged | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -25.4% | -73.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +39.3% | -4.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.77 | 0.66 |
| Volatility 1Y | 69.42% | 138.51% |
| Max drawdown | -61.15% | -93.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FBL and CONL
Explore further