Screener
FCG vs UNG
First Trust Natural Gas ETF vs United States Natural Gas Fund, LP
Key differences
- FCG costs 0.58% less per year.
- FCG is classified as equity, while UNG is commodity — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, FCG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FCG | UNG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 1.17% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $818M | $533M |
| Since | 2007 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 2.04% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | commodity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | — |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.9% | -33.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.3% | -27.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +18.3% | -23.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.40 | -0.32 |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.75% | 60.76% |
| Max drawdown | -85.03% | -93.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FCG and UNG
Explore further