Screener
FCLO vs CLOA
Fidelity CLO ETF vs iShares AAA CLO Active ETF
Key differences
- FCLO costs 0.20% less per year.
- CLOA is significantly larger than FCLO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FCLO follows a multi strategy strategy; CLOA uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| FCLO | CLOA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.00% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $25M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2026 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | — | 5.09% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | multi strategy | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +5.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +6.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 2.57 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 0.72% |
| Max drawdown | -0.58% | -1.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FCLO and CLOA
Explore further