Screener
FCLO vs FIGB
Fidelity CLO ETF vs Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF
Key differences
- FCLO costs 0.36% less per year.
- FIGB is significantly larger than FCLO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FCLO follows a multi strategy strategy; FIGB uses index tracking.
- FIGB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FCLO | FIGB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.00% | 0.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $25M | $465M |
| Since | 2026 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | — | 4.13% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | multi strategy | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +5.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +3.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 4.53% |
| Max drawdown | -0.58% | -18.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FCLO and FIGB
Explore further