Screener
FCOM vs GXPC
Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF vs Global X Purecap MSCI Communication Services ETF
Key differences
- FCOM costs 0.07% less per year.
- FCOM is significantly larger than GXPC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FCOM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FCOM | GXPC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.08% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.8B | $77M |
| Since | 2013 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.91% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.21 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.32% | — |
| Max drawdown | -46.95% | -16.59% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FCOM and GXPC
Explore further