Screener
FCOM vs XLC
Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF vs State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR ETF
Key differences
- XLC is significantly larger than FCOM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, FCOM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FCOM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FCOM | XLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.08% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.8B | $25.6B |
| Since | 2013 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.91% | 1.20% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.8% | +17.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.5% | +25.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.3% | +10.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.21 | 1.22 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.32% | 13.16% |
| Max drawdown | -46.95% | -46.65% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FCOM and XLC
Explore further