Screener
FCUS vs BCHP
Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF vs Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF
Key differences
- BCHP costs 0.22% less per year.
- FCUS covers north america markets; BCHP covers global.
- FCUS follows a active selection strategy; BCHP uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| FCUS | BCHP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.58% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $75M | $223M |
| Since | 2022 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.02% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +90.5% | +7.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +35.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.03 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 33.71% | 15.85% |
| Max drawdown | -39.89% | -18.56% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FCUS and BCHP
Explore further