Screener
FDAT vs GAL
Tactical Advantage ETF vs State Street Global Allocation ETF
Key differences
FDAT is a fixed income ETF, while GAL is a mixed asset ETF. FDAT charges 0.78% a year and GAL 0.35%.
- FDAT is a fixed income fund, while GAL is a mixed asset fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- FDAT covers North America; GAL covers global markets.
- GAL costs 0.43% less per year.
- GAL is much larger than FDAT. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, GAL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GAL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDAT | GAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.78% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $36M | $306M |
| Since | 2023 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 5.63% | 3.11% |
| Asset class | fixed income | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.8% | +18.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.7% | +13.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.54 | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.36% | 9.16% |
| Max drawdown | -8.20% | -28.31% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.