Screener
FDAT vs TUG
Tactical Advantage ETF vs STF Tactical Growth ETF
Key differences
- TUG costs 0.13% less per year.
- FDAT is classified as alternative, while TUG is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- FDAT follows a tactical allocation strategy; TUG uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, TUG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDAT | TUG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.78% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $35M | $42M |
| Since | 2023 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 5.68% | 0.58% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.6% | +41.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.9% | +24.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.57 | 1.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.95% | 16.24% |
| Max drawdown | -8.20% | -22.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDAT and TUG
Explore further