Screener
FDAT vs MAGO
Tactical Advantage ETF vs Tuttle Capital Magnificent 7 Income Blast ETF
Key differences
FDAT is a fixed income ETF, while MAGO is an alternative ETF. FDAT charges 0.78% a year and MAGO 0.99%.
- FDAT is a fixed income fund, while MAGO is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- FDAT follows a tactical allocation strategy; MAGO uses option income.
- FDAT costs 0.21% less per year.
- FDAT is much larger than MAGO. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDAT | MAGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.78% | 0.99% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $36M | $2M |
| Since | 2023 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 5.63% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.54 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.36% | — |
| Max drawdown | -8.20% | -17.98% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.