Screener
FDAT vs TUGN
Tactical Advantage ETF vs STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF
Key differences
- TUGN costs 0.13% less per year.
- FDAT follows a tactical allocation strategy; TUGN uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, TUGN has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDAT | TUGN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.78% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $35M | $78M |
| Since | 2023 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 5.68% | 11.46% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.6% | +38.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.9% | +24.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.57 | 1.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.95% | 15.38% |
| Max drawdown | -8.20% | -23.45% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDAT and TUGN
Explore further