Screener
FDAT vs SPFF
Tactical Advantage ETF vs Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF
Key differences
Both FDAT and SPFF are fixed income ETFs. FDAT charges 0.78% a year and SPFF 0.48%. The main difference: FDAT follows a tactical allocation strategy; SPFF uses index tracking.
- FDAT follows a tactical allocation strategy; SPFF uses index tracking.
- SPFF costs 0.30% less per year.
- SPFF is much larger than FDAT. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- SPFF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDAT | SPFF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.78% | 0.48% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $36M | $144M |
| Since | 2023 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 5.63% | 6.32% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.8% | +16.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.7% | +8.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.54 | 0.51 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.36% | 9.85% |
| Max drawdown | -8.20% | -35.92% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.