Screener
FDEV vs XNAV
Fidelity International Multifactor ETF vs FundX Aggressive ETF
Key differences
- FDEV costs 1.09% less per year.
- FDEV is significantly larger than XNAV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FDEV is classified as equity, while XNAV is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- FDEV follows a index tracking strategy; XNAV uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, XNAV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDEV | XNAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | 1.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $271M | $31M |
| Since | 2019 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 2.75% | 0.51% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.4% | +44.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.6% | +25.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.86 | 1.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.93% | 16.54% |
| Max drawdown | -30.11% | -24.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDEV and XNAV
Explore further