Screener
FDG vs ACSV
American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF vs American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF
Key differences
- FDG is significantly larger than ACSV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FDG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDG | ACSV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $387M | $12M |
| Since | 2020 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +32.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.24 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.88% | — |
| Max drawdown | -43.69% | -7.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDG and ACSV
Explore further