Screener
FDG vs CGGG
American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF vs Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF
Key differences
- CGGG costs 0.06% less per year.
- FDG is significantly larger than CGGG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FDG follows a active selection strategy; CGGG uses index tracking.
- FDG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDG | CGGG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $387M | $78M |
| Since | 2020 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +32.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.24 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.88% | — |
| Max drawdown | -43.69% | -17.74% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDG and CGGG
Explore further