Screener
FDG vs GSLC
American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF vs Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
Key differences
- GSLC costs 0.36% less per year.
- GSLC is significantly larger than FDG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FDG follows a active selection strategy; GSLC uses index enhanced.
- Over the last 3 years, FDG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GSLC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDG | GSLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $387M | $15.0B |
| Since | 2020 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.97% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.4% | +24.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +32.2% | +21.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.6% | +12.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.24 | 1.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.88% | 11.86% |
| Max drawdown | -43.69% | -33.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDG and GSLC
Explore further