Screener
FDG vs GSSC
American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF vs Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
Key differences
- GSSC costs 0.25% less per year.
- FDG follows a active selection strategy; GSSC uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, FDG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDG | GSSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $387M | $952M |
| Since | 2020 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.4% | +31.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +32.2% | +17.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.6% | +7.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.24 | 0.72 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.88% | 18.61% |
| Max drawdown | -43.69% | -41.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDG and GSSC
Explore further