Screener
FDG vs NUMG
American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF vs Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- NUMG costs 0.14% less per year.
- FDG follows a active selection strategy; NUMG uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, FDG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDG | NUMG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.31% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $387M | $354M |
| Since | 2020 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.01% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.4% | -1.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +32.2% | +8.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.6% | +1.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.24 | 0.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.88% | 17.94% |
| Max drawdown | -43.69% | -38.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDG and NUMG
Explore further