Screener
FDIQ vs KAUG
Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF vs Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - August
Key differences
- FDIQ costs 0.44% less per year.
- FDIQ is classified as fixed income, while KAUG is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- FDIQ follows a index tracking strategy; KAUG uses structured outcome.
- FDIQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDIQ | KAUG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $52M | $80M |
| Since | 2011 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 2.42% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.5% | +17.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 22.13% | 8.09% |
| Max drawdown | -52.86% | -15.66% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDIQ and KAUG
Explore further