Screener
FDIQ vs XMLV
Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF
Key differences
- XMLV costs 0.10% less per year.
- XMLV is significantly larger than FDIQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FDIQ is classified as fixed income, while XMLV is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, FDIQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDIQ | XMLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $52M | $750M |
| Since | 2011 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 2.42% | 2.80% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.5% | +10.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.4% | +11.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.5% | +6.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | 0.64 |
| Volatility 1Y | 22.13% | 10.33% |
| Max drawdown | -52.86% | -39.86% |
Similar to FDIQ and XMLV
Explore further