Screener
XMLV vs PSCF
Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF vs Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF
Key differences
- XMLV is significantly larger than PSCF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PSCF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| XMLV | PSCF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $750M | $25M |
| Since | 2013 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 2.80% | 2.34% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.0% | +22.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.6% | +18.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.3% | +4.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.64 | 0.73 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.33% | 17.57% |
| Max drawdown | -39.86% | -45.46% |
Similar to XMLV and PSCF
Explore further