Screener
FDLO vs ONEV
Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF vs State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF
Key differences
- FDLO costs 0.05% less per year.
- FDLO is classified as equity, while ONEV is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- FDLO follows a index tracking strategy; ONEV uses multi strategy.
- Over the last 3 years, FDLO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDLO | ONEV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.4B | $501M |
| Since | 2016 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 1.37% | 1.78% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.4% | +12.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.7% | +12.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.3% | +7.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.98 | 0.73 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.91% | 11.35% |
| Max drawdown | -34.35% | -39.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDLO and ONEV
Explore further