Screener
FDRS vs BETZ
Corgi ETF Trust I vs Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF
Key differences
- FDRS costs 0.26% less per year.
- FDRS is classified as alternative, while BETZ is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- FDRS follows a leveraged strategy; BETZ uses index tracking.
- BETZ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDRS | BETZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $77M | $51M |
| Since | 2025 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | — | 4.96% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | leveraged | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | -7.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -7.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 20.37% |
| Max drawdown | -21.64% | -60.82% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDRS and BETZ
Explore further