Screener
FDRS vs QDTE
Corgi ETF Trust I vs Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
Key differences
- FDRS costs 0.47% less per year.
- QDTE is significantly larger than FDRS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FDRS follows a leveraged strategy; QDTE uses option income.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDRS | QDTE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.96% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $77M | $828M |
| Since | 2025 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | — | 45.82% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +42.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 14.95% |
| Max drawdown | -21.64% | -22.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDRS and QDTE
Explore further