Screener
FDRS vs CGCB
Corgi ETF Trust I vs Capital Group Core Bond ETF
Key differences
- CGCB costs 0.22% less per year.
- CGCB is significantly larger than FDRS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FDRS is classified as alternative, while CGCB is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- FDRS follows a leveraged strategy; CGCB uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDRS | CGCB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $77M | $4.8B |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | — | 4.23% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +5.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 3.99% |
| Max drawdown | -21.64% | -5.16% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDRS and CGCB
Explore further