Screener
FDRS vs CGCP
Corgi ETF Trust I vs Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF
Key differences
- CGCP costs 0.15% less per year.
- CGCP is significantly larger than FDRS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FDRS is classified as alternative, while CGCP is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- FDRS covers north america markets; CGCP covers global.
- FDRS follows a leveraged strategy; CGCP uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDRS | CGCP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.34% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $77M | $7.6B |
| Since | 2025 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | — | 5.14% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | leveraged | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +6.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 3.74% |
| Max drawdown | -21.64% | -15.07% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDRS and CGCP
Explore further