Screener
FDRS vs FSGS
Corgi ETF Trust I vs First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF
Key differences
- FDRS costs 0.12% less per year.
- FDRS is classified as alternative, while FSGS is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- FDRS follows a leveraged strategy; FSGS uses index tracking.
- FSGS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDRS | FSGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.61% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $77M | $29M |
| Since | 2025 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +6.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +8.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +2.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.32 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.31% |
| Max drawdown | -21.64% | -43.25% |
Similar to FDRS and FSGS
Explore further