Screener
FDRS vs IWL
Corgi ETF Trust I vs iShares Russell Top 200 ETF
Key differences
- IWL costs 0.34% less per year.
- IWL is significantly larger than FDRS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FDRS is classified as alternative, while IWL is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- FDRS follows a leveraged strategy; IWL uses index tracking.
- IWL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDRS | IWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $77M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2025 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.86% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +31.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +24.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +15.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.28 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 12.32% |
| Max drawdown | -21.64% | -32.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDRS and IWL
Explore further