Screener
FDRS vs IWR
Corgi ETF Trust I vs iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF
Key differences
- IWR costs 0.31% less per year.
- IWR is significantly larger than FDRS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FDRS is classified as alternative, while IWR is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- FDRS follows a leveraged strategy; IWR uses index tracking.
- IWR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDRS | IWR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $77M | $52.6B |
| Since | 2025 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.19% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +23.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.86 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 13.52% |
| Max drawdown | -21.64% | -40.59% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDRS and IWR
Explore further