Screener
FDRS vs LCR
Corgi ETF Trust I vs Leuthold Core ETF
Key differences
- FDRS costs 0.35% less per year.
- FDRS is classified as alternative, while LCR is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- FDRS follows a leveraged strategy; LCR uses active selection.
- LCR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDRS | LCR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.84% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $77M | $70M |
| Since | 2025 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.35% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | leveraged | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +14.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +11.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 7.52% |
| Max drawdown | -21.64% | -17.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDRS and LCR
Explore further