Screener
FDRS vs LST
Corgi ETF Trust I vs Leuthold Select Industries ETF
Key differences
- FDRS costs 0.16% less per year.
- FDRS is classified as alternative, while LST is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- FDRS follows a leveraged strategy; LST uses active selection.
- LST has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDRS | LST | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $77M | $150M |
| Since | 2025 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.34% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +33.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 14.38% |
| Max drawdown | -21.64% | -19.47% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDRS and LST
Explore further