Screener
FDRS vs MPRO
Corgi ETF Trust I vs Monarch ProCap ETF
Key differences
- FDRS costs 0.58% less per year.
- MPRO is significantly larger than FDRS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FDRS is classified as alternative, while MPRO is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- FDRS follows a leveraged strategy; MPRO uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDRS | MPRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 1.07% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $77M | $253M |
| Since | 2025 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.89% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | leveraged | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +14.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +10.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 6.68% |
| Max drawdown | -21.64% | -14.50% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDRS and MPRO
Explore further