Screener
MPRO vs CGBL
Monarch ProCap ETF vs Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Key differences
- CGBL costs 0.74% less per year.
- CGBL is significantly larger than MPRO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MPRO follows a index tracking strategy; CGBL uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| MPRO | CGBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.07% | 0.33% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $253M | $6.1B |
| Since | 2021 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.89% | 1.92% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.7% | +19.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.68% | 9.65% |
| Max drawdown | -14.50% | -11.66% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MPRO and CGBL
Explore further