Screener
FDRS vs TMFC
Corgi ETF Trust I vs Motley Fool 100 Index ETF
Key differences
- TMFC is significantly larger than FDRS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FDRS is classified as alternative, while TMFC is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- FDRS follows a leveraged strategy; TMFC uses index tracking.
- TMFC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDRS | TMFC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $77M | $2.0B |
| Since | 2025 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.14% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +28.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +28.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +16.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 13.72% |
| Max drawdown | -21.64% | -33.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDRS and TMFC
Explore further