Screener
FDRS vs UFO
Corgi ETF Trust I vs Procure Space ETF
Key differences
- FDRS costs 0.26% less per year.
- UFO is significantly larger than FDRS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FDRS is classified as alternative, while UFO is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- FDRS follows a leveraged strategy; UFO uses index tracking.
- UFO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDRS | UFO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $77M | $749M |
| Since | 2025 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.32% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +176.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +54.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +20.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.40 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 36.94% |
| Max drawdown | -21.64% | -50.33% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDRS and UFO
Explore further