Screener
FELC vs REVS
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF vs Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF
Key differences
- FELC is significantly larger than REVS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FELC follows a active selection strategy; REVS uses index tracking.
- FELC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FELC | REVS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7.0B | $284M |
| Since | 2007 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 0.90% | 0.97% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.3% | +28.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +19.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +11.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.05% | 11.62% |
| Max drawdown | -18.59% | -37.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FELC and REVS
Explore further