Screener
FELG vs FBCV
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF vs Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF
Key differences
- FELG costs 0.39% less per year.
- FELG is significantly larger than FBCV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FELG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FELG | FBCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | 0.57% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.3B | $160M |
| Since | 2007 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.36% | 1.44% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.9% | +25.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +15.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.92 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.56% | 10.61% |
| Max drawdown | -23.89% | -15.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FELG and FBCV
Explore further