Screener
FELG vs GSGO
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF vs Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- FELG costs 0.27% less per year.
- FELG is significantly larger than GSGO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GSGO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FELG | GSGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.3B | $163M |
| Since | 2007 | 1999 |
| Dividend yield | 0.36% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.56% | — |
| Max drawdown | -23.89% | -13.88% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FELG and GSGO
Explore further