Screener
FELG vs MFIG
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF vs Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF
Key differences
- FELG costs 0.32% less per year.
- FELG is significantly larger than MFIG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FELG follows a active selection strategy; MFIG uses index tracking.
- FELG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FELG | MFIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.3B | $9M |
| Since | 2007 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.36% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.53% | — |
| Max drawdown | -23.89% | -14.29% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FELG and MFIG
Explore further