Screener
FELV vs ABFL
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF vs Abacus FCF Leaders ETF
Key differences
Both FELV and ABFL are equity ETFs. FELV charges 0.18% a year and ABFL 0.49%. The main difference: FELV follows a index tracking strategy; ABFL uses active selection.
- FELV follows a index tracking strategy; ABFL uses active selection.
- FELV costs 0.31% less per year.
- FELV is much larger than ABFL. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- FELV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FELV | ABFL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.0B | $520M |
| Since | 2007 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 1.52% | 0.54% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.0% | +18.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.93 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.16% | 16.02% |
| Max drawdown | -16.08% | -34.95% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.