Screener
FENI vs XNAV
Fidelity Enhanced International ETF vs FundX Aggressive ETF
Key differences
- FENI costs 0.99% less per year.
- FENI is significantly larger than XNAV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FENI is classified as equity, while XNAV is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FENI | XNAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.28% | 1.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9.1B | $31M |
| Since | 2007 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 2.93% | 0.51% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | europe | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.1% | +44.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +25.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.63% | 16.54% |
| Max drawdown | -14.20% | -24.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FENI and XNAV
Explore further