Screener
FFF vs KONG
Founders 100 ETF vs Formidable Fortress ETF
Key differences
- FFF costs 0.14% less per year.
- KONG is significantly larger than FFF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FFF is classified as equity, while KONG is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- FFF follows a active selection strategy; KONG uses option income.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFF | KONG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.89% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3M | $22M |
| Since | 2025 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.36% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +6.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +9.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.49 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 10.91% |
| Max drawdown | -21.89% | -19.98% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FFF and KONG
Explore further