Screener
KONG vs FDRS
Formidable Fortress ETF vs Corgi ETF Trust I
Key differences
- FDRS costs 0.40% less per year.
- FDRS is significantly larger than KONG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KONG follows a option income strategy; FDRS uses leveraged.
Side-by-side comparison
| KONG | FDRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.89% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $22M | $77M |
| Since | 2021 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.36% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | option income | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.49 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.91% | — |
| Max drawdown | -19.98% | -21.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KONG and FDRS
Explore further